*
*
Atypicality, actually a weblog masquerading as a web site.
 
a typ•i•cal i•ty 

def:  Not corresponding to the normal form or type

*
Home  |  Does this site have any purpose?  |  Starting Point aka my World View  | My Bombastic Blatherings  | Reactive Respondents Reply
**
Biohazard-- run for your lives

Reminder!

This is the warning symbol for materials that are considered to be a biohazard. 

The symbol is placed here to serve as a warning to all visitors. 

Some of the views expressed either on the main page or in a guestbook note could be quite toxic!

Enter at your own peril!

 

Can’t Win for Losing    December 22, 2008 




“Can’t Win for Losing” is a phrase meaning that things would be going great for you if they weren't going so badly.

I have a feeling that Pastor Rick Warren of the Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, California could feel exactly that way at this moment and all because he actually has a cordial relationship with President-Elect Barack Obama. 

He has been invited to give the invocation at the Inaugural Ceremony on January 20th, 2009 and his selection by the soon to be President has the gay community virtually ballistic because they see him as the enemy personified and they are zapping the President-Elect selecting him because of his stance on gay marriage.

Then I read on the web today an article by the Associated Press on MSNBC and its headline reads “Rick Warren's critics include other evangelicals”, and the sub head reads “Many feel he's not conservative enough, even as gays call him prejudiced.”

I am sure that Rick Warren is actually only interested in God’s opinion and the fact that two so diametrically opposed groups are throwing verbal bombs at him is likely not a concern.  I find it amusing that these groups are both taking potshots at Rick and it is possible that he and President-Elect Obama are also enjoying the irony.

As for me my view is in complete accord with the President-Elect on the gay marriage issue.  I do not like the term marriage attached officially to the civil union of two persons of the same sex.  However, the term civil union I find perfectly acceptable. 

The issue is about property rights between two people, and the right to survivorship and dependency.   There simply is not any argument that I can accept as rationale that would deny same sex couples the same rights as married men and women.

I have always maintained that the gay community gone after the rights and not the title that the issue would die of natural causes and eventually the name would have evolved. 

Any time you have two polar opposites swinging at you I think the odds are good that your position in the central is a winner.  The above scoreboard then actually only supports the theme, and not the political fortunes of the two primary targets.
 
 
 
 

Click this icon to send a response to this topic!

 
 
 
 

Content is protected by law, copying anything without permission can be prosecuted!

Contact Atypicality.org  |  Privacy Statement  |  Site Accessibility  | Contact Web Designer about Site Problems


Our Web Designer - Net-werkz Media Group